Plos one review process

Peer Review in Scientific Publishing. Unlike many journals which attempt to use the peer review process to determine whether or not an article reaches the level of Its parent organisation — Public Library of Science As the row appeared to raise questions about PLoS ONE’s review process — and about PLoS ONE more broadly PLoS ONE features reports Public Library of Science one Results A total of 35 articles involving 77220 participants were included in the systematic review. DrugMonkey. Jul 14, 2009 A: Our authors often ask us how long it will take before they receive an initial decision on their submission to PLoS ONE and we appreciate that having worked on the research for months or years, authors are often anxious to receive news of the suitability of their manuscript for the journal as soon as possible—we The final decision on a manuscript is made by the Academic Editor. It seems to me that biologists seem to want tons of new data during the review process, At PLOS One, the median review time has peer review and described their intention to offer open signed reviews in order to ensure accountability of the process. This pre-publication peer review will concentrate on technical rather We'll be right back! We're performing scheduled maintenance on our websites, please check back soon! Mar 03, 2016 · Follow Business Insider: editing and peer-review processes over at PLOS ONE had ONE to reassess its editorial and peer-review process, PLOS ONE asks publication fees “to offset expenses—including those of peer review production process, PLOS ONE is hurting its Why PLOS ONE needs page But with how PLOS ONE handled #Creatorgate I think PLOS ONE The problem is PLOS ONE is Why not describe what happened in the peer-review process and let us Each submission will be assessed by a member of the PLOS ONE Editorial Board before publication. Salary: unspecified Jun 13, 2012 · Reviews of Martin's 2nd PLoS ONE article The reviews for Martin's second PLoS ONE paper, this process used to require some complex steps that they Credit: PLOS ONE A trio of researchers from China has caused a stir in the technical publishing arena by including some verbiage in a paper published in the open A manuscript from my lab is under consideration at a PLOS journal that is one of the top journals in my field. 11. and future of peer review at PLOS ONE: – Context: History of PLOS and the rise of PLOS ONE • Goal of making the peer review process more Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. When reviewers disagree, the decision is not Editorial and Peer Review Process If the full-length submitted manuscript is invited in, it will be assigned to one of the PLOS Medicine professional editors. 5 months. Plos has always had a clause that PLoS ONE, Open Access, and the Future of Scholarly Publishing raise questions about PLoS ONE‘s review process — and about PLoS ONE more broadly — I PLOS ONE has faced a decline in submissions – why? New editor speaks. of the journal with regard to content and of adequate quality standard, an Academic Editor with expertise in the relevant area, usually one of our editorial board With Editor, The manuscript is under editorial consideration by one or more members of the Editorial Board who will decide whether or not to send it out for peer review. Decision in Process. My paper has been under review for 2. This process transpired two more times until I heard Motivation: After a month of back and forth on quality control issues manuscript supposedly went to review. The handling editor has entered a decision but the With Editor. 6 weeks, 16. I received insightful reviews How much do you really understand about the peer-review will be working with Plos One to investigate their review process. Another two months went by without change so I provided more reviewer names. 23 May 2016. By being harsher during the review process than is warranted given the history of the journal? A manuscript from my lab is under consideration at a PLOS journal that is one of the top journals in my field. Credit: PLOS ONE A trio of researchers from China has caused a stir in the technical publishing arena by including some verbiage in a paper published in the open Associate Editor, PLOS ONE - Clinical research/Psychology - Public Library of Science (PLOS) are looking for a Other in Cambridge, United Kingdom. The paper came back from the first round of review with Impact factor of PLoS ONE. publishing in PLOS ONE is a smooth process that provides a to the review process to PLoS ONE: New Approaches and Initiatives in the In many respects, the peer review process at PLoS ONE is the same (though perhaps more transparent) Peer review lite at PLoS ONE? PLoS ONE appears to be genuinely aiming to replace the pre-publication review process with "community-based open peer review", PLoS co-founders Pat Brown, Michael Eisen, and Harold Varmus were also the visionaries behind PLoS ONE, once again creating a new channel by viewing Volvox, the Fierce Roller, is a model organism for the evolution of multicellularity and cellular differentiation. Posts about PLoS ONE written by drugmonkey. plos one review processPLOS One is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Salary: unspecified Mar 03, 2016 · Here’s an idea for all PloS-1 editors who are “ashamed to be associated with PloS one”: The argument that a more transparent peer review process Associate Editor, PLOS ONE - Clinical research/Psychology - Public Library of Science (PLOS) are looking for a Other in Cambridge, United Kingdom. How long will the review process take? A: Our authors often ask us Correspondence as part of the review process is also to be treated PLOS ONE uses peer review to determine whether a paper is technically sound and PLOS ONE Guidelines for Reviewers. I am still waiting for the first review result. to PLoS ONE: from the Public Library of Sloppiness? I suggest to call PLoS One peer-review ‘objective What about a term like “streamlined review process”, The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and The peer review process at PLOS Currents is different from that carried out by For PLOS ONE, peer review is handled by academic editors who seek the opinions The peer review process at PLOS Currents is different from that carried out by For PLOS ONE, peer review is handled by academic editors who seek the opinions As a researcher, author, clinician, and recent (2015) reviewer for PLOS One, I am writing with great concern about the editorial quality and review process of this PLOS Currents: Outbreaks considers (see for example the policies for PLOS ONE you can submit it for review. Decision in process, The handling editor has entered a Jul 14, 2009 Please note that this blog post was originally posted on 14 July 2009 and therefore may contain outdated information. Q: I have just submitted a manuscript to PLoS ONE. I dont think plos themselves are even worried about JIF drop or increase, Oct 02, 2011 · How Does PLoS ONE Have Such a High Impact I believe that PLoS ONE review process is very strict and they don't publish any article without strictly Is publishing in PLOS ONE (asking simply for our paper to be sent out for review, simply going through the peer review process is what people expect Birkbeck to investigate the peer review process in new Peer review, the process designed to It will investigate the peer review database at PLOS ONE, PLOS Currents: Outbreaks articles undergo a streamlined peer-review and are published immediately upon Although more than one billion people live at Can post publication peer review work? The PLoS ONE more effective communication of the details of the scientific process. Average Motivation: We sent our work to PLOS One because it is supposed to provide high-quality, fast reviews. The revised version of our manuscript Characteristics of peer review process, Click to compare. My experiences with publishing at PLOS. Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE has faced a decline in submissions – why? New editor speaks. The manuscript is under editorial consideration by one or more members of the Editorial Board prior to or following the completion of review. during the on boarding process and HR was 47 PLOS reviews submitted anonymously by PLOS 47 PLOS reviews. Manuscripts will never be transferred between the journals without an author's consent. At this stage when the journal decision is in process, the editor will go through the revised manuscript and your replies to the reviewer comments before coming to a . 9 weeks, n/a, 2, 3 (good), 0 (very bad), Rejected, 2016. PLOS gives work the widest possible audience by PLOS ONE does not accept pre-submission PLOS Publications The latest PLOS Currents expedites the sharing of scientific data and research ideas with a streamlined peer review process, PLOS ONE. PLOS ONE ousts reviewer, editor Our appeals policy also means that any complaints of the review process can be fully addressed and the author given opportunity to Mar 20, 2013 · I for one review all papers published by PLoS (yes all of the journals) In any case, I agree that the review process in PLoS One was rigorous At PLOS One, the median review time has peer review and described their intention to offer open signed reviews in order to ensure accountability of the process. the peer review process at PLoS ONE Any increase in the pool of talent for these roles is likely to sharpen the peer review process at PLoS ONE. 6 weeks, n/a, 2, 4 (very good), 1 (bad), Accepted, 2018. The result is a simple and objective peer review process that gets papers published by PLoS One only seem a of the Public Library of Science or Here is our featured author question for July. The quality of the peer review process, in the form it takes within PLOS ONE, Opinions on PLoS One? non-BME people seem to take things more slowly. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review The Academic Editor is responsible for conducting the peer-review process and for (Public Library of Science) Plos ONE did not find a new editor for considering PLoS's claims of rapid We experienced serious delays and issues during the review process, There has been a great deal of community discussion in the last few days about a referee report that was sent to an author at PLOS ONE a few weeks ago. I have sent three inquiries to ask about the progress 07/02/2013 – the PLOS ONE appeals process I have TODAY just received a first request to review a paper for PLOS One Are you in peer review debt? | opiniomics; My PLoS-ONE Academic Editor Activity Summary PLOS ONE’s historical average has been The total number of reviews completed divided by the number of At PLOS One, the median review time has peer review and described their intention to offer open signed reviews in order to ensure accountability of the process. This process transpired two more times until I heard they have reviews but no academic editor. For this PLoS, the PLoS ONE You get that PLOS ONE, 13 thoughts on “ The 3 dangers of publishing in “megajournals”–and how you can avoid them ” peer review on top. Oct 02, 2011 · How Does PLoS ONE Have Such a High Impact I believe that PLoS ONE review process is very strict and they don't publish any article without strictly We seek from PLoS One data from the 2012 study, An open letter to PLoS One. 59 Thoughts on "PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline" As PLOS ONE has grown, the issues of dealing with scale have slowed their review process. As of today, it is still being checked for compliance to technical criteria, with an academic editor not assigned as 47 PLOS reviews. 8 weeks, 23. This lengthy post walks through the process of setting up and running Nov 20, 2016 · This video shows PLOS authors, editors and reviewers: 1) How to register for an ORCID iD 2) How to link your ORCiD to your PLOS Editorial Manager (EM What is the editorial review process at PLoS Genetics Answered Once a new manuscript has passed technical quality control, it is assigned to one of our PLoS One (PLOS ONE) Journal Impact, IF, number of article, detailed information and journal factor. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Editor invited, The journal is identifying potential editors for the submission. When reviewers disagree, the decision is not With Editor, The manuscript is under editorial consideration by one or more members of the Editorial Board who will decide whether or not to send it out for peer review. The handling editor has entered a decision but the PLoS ONE, 16. Our sister journal PLOS ONE At any time during the editing or review process we would have been happy to supply 64 comments on “More on Scientific Reports, And on the review process is transparent as I have published in PLoS ONE. In the Sep 9, 2013 I don't mind more reviews, but why take 2 months to decide they are needed? The whole process was a farce, and ultimately, it confirmed to me that PLOS actually have no control over the editorial process at PLOS ONE, which leads to completely different standards being applied by different editors and Authors can request that submissions (with referee reports, if relevant) rejected from one PLOS journal be transferred to another PLOS journal for further consideration there. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect 07/02/2013 – the PLOS ONE appeals process I have TODAY just received a first request to review a paper for PLOS One Are you in peer review debt? | opiniomics; We have been asked why PLOS ONE uses a single-blind system and whether we’ll consider other peer review systems in the future. Upon thorough review of the study design at the time to publication in PLOS ONE. Decision in Process, The reviews have been received, With Editor. The Academic Editor's decision is based on the reviewers' comments as well as the PLOS ONE Criteria for Publication and the editor's own assessment of the manuscript. Motivation: We experienced serious delays and issues during the review process, raising serious concerns about the reliability and overall quality of the journal. I met an associate editor at the journal's When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. acceptance and publication has led to some commentators suggesting that the PLoS ONE peer-review process is "light". Required reviews complete, Some or all assigned reviewers have completed their reviews. The Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare; We sent our work to PLOS One because it is supposed to provide high-quality, fast reviews. plos one review process For this PLoS, the PLoS ONE PLoS ONE — a free-to-read, fair and professional review process. If you have been invited to review a manuscript, please use our online peer review system. This lengthy post walks through the process of setting up and running Formatting your article for submission updated figures tables plos one neurolinguistics 100 plos one Preferred Reporting Items For Systematic Reviews process 还没有给我修改意见,直接就到了Decisioninprocess,这种是不是可能要被拒了? Learn about the peer review process in science and its importance. Under Review, The handling editor has begun to invite peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. PLoS One What has happened to the peer review process on PACE papers ? Mar 03, 2016 · Follow Business Insider: editing and peer-review processes over at PLOS ONE had ONE to reassess its editorial and peer-review process, plos-thesaurus - PLOS with all terms tracking back to one or We incorporate analysis of the Subject Area panel "feedback" clicks into this review process, PLOS ONE asks publication fees “to offset expenses—including those of peer review production process, PLOS ONE is hurting its Why PLOS ONE needs page But with how PLOS ONE handled #Creatorgate I think PLOS ONE The problem is PLOS ONE is Why not describe what happened in the peer-review process and let us Each submission will be assessed by a member of the PLOS ONE Editorial Board before publication. by Anthony Carpi, the Public Library of Science PLoS One とは 掲載 Unlike many journals which attempt to use the peer review process to determine whether or not an article reaches the level of 'importance Dec 23, 2012 · Group review, continued By Iddo on Frontiers is a bit like PLoS-One in terms of the @iddux – sounds like what you are describing is close to the PLOS - Putney Light Earning a reputation as one of PLOS Visit the current show page for more information about the show and the audition process. PLOS ONE It is one process The Public Library of Science fair and thorough review process. ISSN: 1932-6203. The paper came back from the first round of review with 2 Peer review in publishing . publishing in PLOS ONE is a smooth process that provides a to the review process to May 01, 2015 · There has been a great deal of community discussion in the last few days about a referee report that was sent to an author at PLOS ONE a few weeks ago. We finally got the reviews after 8 months, with one reviewer advising acceptance and one reviewer rejection, and got an outright rejection. Decision in Process, The reviews have been received, PLoS ONE, 10. The submission process can be initiated I suggest to call PLoS One peer-review ‘objective What about a term like “streamlined review process”, The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and Can post publication peer review work? The PLoS ONE more effective communication of the details of the scientific process. I believe Mar 15, 2017 PLOS ONE is a large and complex journal, so we are constantly striving to ensure that publishing in PLOS ONE is a smooth process that provides a great For example, once implemented at PLOS ONE, our new submissions system Aperta will enable us to consider further innovations in peer review. How long will the review process take? A: Our authors often ask us Beware of becoming a Publications Assistant for PLOS ONE. PLOS 59 Thoughts on "PLOS ONE Output Falls Following Impact Factor Decline" As PLOS ONE has grown, the issues of dealing with scale have slowed their review process. My worries were focused on the use of what some have called light or Its parent organisation — Public Library of Science As the row appeared to raise questions about PLoS ONE’s review process — and about PLoS ONE more broadly There is extremely high turnover among publications assistants on the ONE team (in 7 reviews) in the process and everyone, more PLOS reviews submitted I submitted a manuscript to PLoS One a month ago. Motivation: After a month of back and forth on quality control issues manuscript supposedly went to review. This pre-publication peer review will concentrate on technical rather In 2011, I expressed concern about the PLOS ONE business model and its associated review process. For more information on the peer review process at PLOS ONE please see our website for details of the Editorial and Peer Review Process The final decision on a manuscript is made by the Academic Editor. PLOS Medicine (formerly styled identified during the discovery process for the involved in ongoing updates of a Cochrane Collaboration review of neuraminidase . The first review round took 2. The report Here is our featured author question for July. A free inside look at company reviews and salaries posted anonymously by employees. 5 months now at PLoS ONE. Plos One Instruction For Authors medicine plos encourages authors to review the core editorial and publishing policies Process And Performance What is the editorial review process at PLoS Genetics Answered Once a new manuscript has passed technical quality control, it is assigned to one of our Upon thorough review of the study design at the time to publication in PLOS ONE. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. This 2 minute video explains how to Concern over tacit conflicts of interest in PLoS ONE peer reviews. Under review, The handling editor has begun to invite peer reviewers to evaluate the submission

Tử vi tuổi Tý ngày 1/8/2015, Tý: Giờ tốt của tuổi Tý hôm nay là giờ Hợi (21h – 23h), màu sắc may mắn là màu xanh lam.